Global NATO

The most important role of government is to provide security and maintain stability. Significant changes occurred in the perception of global threat especially after September 11. People no longer need a government to declare war. Communities with indefinite identities, borders, and power (namely terrorists) start a war against a nation who has the most powerful military force.

Organized crime networks gain global dimensions in traffic of drugs, arms, humans, and organs. Mankind is under threat of chemical, biological, and nuclear mass destruction weapons. In the future, mankind may have to protect itself from spatial threats.

Globalization of threats has common root causes:

(i) Ease of attaining technology. Big governments started to lose their monopoly in many areas as a result of technological developments (like biological weapons), and they are trying to preserve their superiority in other areas through international agreements.
(ii) Imbalances on earth. About one-fifth of people living on earth are trying to survive with $1 a day income, whereas nearly half of them manage with $2 a day. Developed countries spend $600 billion for military expenditures; provide agricultural subsidies of around $300 billion, while their foreign aid budgets do not add up to $60 billion. Furthermore the proportion of humans living in developed countries is decreasing every year.
Another imbalance example arises on use of water, which form the basis of life. An average person needs 5 liters of water daily in order to survive, and need 50 liters of water when other vital activities such as cooking and washing are taken into consideration. However, while an American citizen consumes 250-300 liters of water daily, one of five people around the world are not able to attain safe water. Each year more than 5 million people die as a result of diseases caused by lack of access to water (ten times the number of people lost in wars.) A similar situation is relevant on world energy utilization. The refusal of the highest per capita user of energy to participate in the Kyoto Protocol causes reaction. The US is seen as the most important contributor to global warming and is one of the countries with the cheapest energy utilization.
(iii) Developments in communication technology. Developments in technology is bringing the dictum of “God sees everything” into reality by enabling “The global society to see everything.” Information not given through CNN, reaches people through El Cezire; information not provided there, reach wide communities through the internet. Consequently, all personal, corporate, and social secrets disappear. Era of superiority, gained by those with information shortens. Whether we want or not, technological developments and democratic way of life increases transparency in all aspects of life. Increased transparency directs communities to be consistent in both internal and external principles.

In summary, governments, no matter how much power they have, will not be able to deal with globilized threats on their own. Consequently, it is essential to organize on a global scale to deal with global threats.
Today, individuals’ urge to shape their future collectively is greater than ever. Their quest for new ways of governance is leading to fundamental changes whereby individuals, private and public institutions try to harmonize their diverse interests through complicated interactive decision making processes. New governance mechanisms involve new, variable partnerships, and networks whose rules of engagement are yet to be formalized.

Today, protection of free trade and clean environment, fight against terrorism and international crime organizations, and issues such as celestial property rights require supra-national governance structures. As important powers and functions are transferred away from the nation-state through consensual delegation of sovereignty, governance is inescapably becoming multilevel, as we can observe from the case of the European Union. And the key issue is becoming the inclusion of the masses into these multi-level governance structures.

We should be aware of the main threat originating from the nature of globalization-localization dualism and its potential for both integration and exclusion at the same time. This threat is the ethnic, national or religion based conflicts which display a tendency to spread, and in some cases turn into ethnic cleansing. Stopping that nightmare will doubtlessly be one of the top priorities of a new global governance structure committed to the vision of democracy and equity.

If we are successful in including rather than excluding all the communities into global governance structures, we have to improve our ability to manage diversity. The past experiences of the mankind can meaningfully contribute to the refinement of diversity management. Let’s take the example of Turkiye, the proud custodian of the land and the civilizations flourished on Asia Minor throughout thousands of years. When we look at the history of the Ottoman and Anatolian civilizations what we see is great fluidity between religions and communities. Just to give an example, the Seljuk Sultan Izzeddin Keykavus II, whose mother was a descendant of the Byzantine aristocracy, routinely organized in his palace theological discussions between Christian priests and Muslim religious leaders. This tradition, particularly highlighted in its Sufi variant, embodies a philosophy of great tolerance and accommodation. Poets and thinkers like Yunus Emre, Haci Bektas Veli, and Mevlana Celaleddin Rumi are inseparable parts of the cultural make-up of the inhabitants of Turkiye. We learn from the historical records that Mevlana Celaleddin, the Sufi religious leader, poet and thinker of the 12. Century, regularly visited the monasteries to exchange views with Christian and Jewish religious people. Prominent Christian clergymen came from Istanbul to discuss with him certain theological issues. It was Yunus Emre, the great Sufi poet and thinker of the 13th century, who preached in one of his poems: “Regard the other, as you regard yourself, this is the meaning of the four Holy Books, if there is any.”

Just as in new movement of alternative medicine where the old traditions of eastern cultures are providing the keys to healing of the body and the mind as a whole, the new developments in management thinking can benefit from the traditions of old civilizations. For example, our tradition of accommodation and tolerance is the reason why until late 19th century the Ottoman political order did not experience ethnic discrimination.

What marked the Seljuk and Ottoman experience in this field was a very specific definition of the “self” and the “other” and an associated administrative form of social organization considerably different from that in the Western world. In this form of organization, the so-called “Millet” (Community) system, different communities enjoyed a considerably high level of autonomy. This system also allowed non-Muslims to be appointed to administrative positions which required a high level of political and financial trustworthiness.

In the 19th century the rise of race based nationalism in the West had its echoes in the Ottoman territory as well. The course of events proceeded in a chain of reactions, paving way to the great sufferings at all parts of the society. History nowhere in the world proceeds along a straight line. Despite the inevitably irregular advance of history, the fundamental context of life in Anatolia is one of coexistence between different groups. In that sense Anatolia’s legacy to the world is one of great diversity management full of rich experiences. These experiences have, therefore, the potential to make significant contribution to the international process of furthering the progress towards better governance of the world.

Can NATO, who is organized during the cold war time, renew itself in this environment and transform itself into a global security system? For this, we need an important change, especially in our minds and social processes.
1. Security is no longer a service that can only be provided by defense forces. In an environment where interdependencies of people increase, the security of networks is a responsibility of those who are a member of these networks. Therefore, threat consciousness and defense responsibility of each member of the society should be increased rather then keeping threat and defense strategies confidential and in the realm of few who are assigned to protect us.
2. For this reason, different governmental units should share the security responsibility. For example, ministry of health, municipality service providers, and regulatory agencies in critical areas such as telecommunication services should start working as a team in providing security.
3. A healthy security system needs business world and support of civil society organizations. For this reason, we have to restructure our processes to increase the understanding of security issues by unconventional parties, from strategy development stage to implementation stages.
4. To deal with global threats, we need legitimate, global institutions that work with globally consistent principles.
To be globally consistent will mean that mankind should start implementing common values in all aspects of life. This is not as easy as it sounds. For example, can the world accept “one man – one vote” principle which is the practiced within national boundaries to be applied in global affairs. Would this bring global legitimacy? Or, should each country’s vote be equal on global system regardless of its size? Or, should countries be able to vote according to their military power? Or should governments and/or companies and/or people be given voting rights according to their economic weights? In that case, how should changes in these weights over time be managed in order to secure the legitimacy of a global system?
Can another approach be to accept the US, which has established a clear superiority in military capabilities, to decide and implement global issues on its own? If so, to gain global legitimacy, should a portion of the votes, say 20%, for US Presidency be given by citizens of other countries?
If international organizations formed after World War II, United Nations, World Bank, IMF, World Trade Organization, and NATO, would be able to restructure themselves around world’s new needs, without losing their decision making and implementation skills and legitimacy, these issues should be solved in a transparent process. Similarly if it is going to be sustainable global example, the new EU constitution should be established through an open and transparent process based on universal principles, not with a view to protect current political balances.
NATO; with its past experiences, decision making infrastructure, common language tradition, powerful investments, and its experience in providing peace and stability, is a candidate for constituting a legitimate base for global security. Meanwhile, for NATO’s mission to gain global dimension, its decision mechanisms should also gain global dimension. For example, an institution, where India and China are not involved on decision mechanisms, will have significant weaknesses on achieving global legitimacy.
In summary, as topics about our daily life gain global characteristics our vision, organizations, and management systems should also gain a global perspective as well. As the world gets smaller and more interconnected, we have to understand that others problems are also our own. Therefore, we have to make sure that good governance principles are applied throughout our management structures and systems.
Good management is building mutual trust with consistent behavior. Good management requires a wisdom, which reflects real justice. “Sufism” philosophy, which has an important place in Anatolian tradition, gives us important clues on this issue. This philosophy based on “tolerance” and “harmony” defines good management as managing ourselves. Good management is to free ourselves from our fears, opening our eyes and hearts to new perspectives and means “regarding others, as we regard ourselves.”
The real legitimacy will be gained only if people have a say about shaping their own future, to contribute in the global decision making process. The content of modern age human rights and democracy is this. This transformation is also in the basis of change from “management concept” to “governance concept”, which means involvement and mutuality.
For sustainable development and world peace, we should understand how our decisions affect others and reach a wisdom level, which will purify us from selfishness. Individuals, civil society organizations, statesman and managers of international organizations will have critical roles in accomplishing a sustainable world order that is just and based on the universal principle of “regarding others, as we regard ourselves.”
If we are successful in bringing democratic principles to the solution of global issues, in inclusion of all the interested parties in global decision making, we will be helping achieve a secure world. Next NATO conference in Turkiye could be a milestone in such a development.

Dr. Argüden

January 1, 2000
From Global Crisis to Global Governance
The mortgage crises that started in the US in 2008 soon turned into a global crisis....
The Global Citizens’ Initiative
February 11, 2018
Responsible Boards – Action Plan for a Sustainable Future
A sustainable global economy is one that combines long-term profitability with ethical behavior, social justice, and...
IFC Private Sector Opinion
March 1, 2015
Right Reward for Right Performance
Aligning Executive Compensation with Good Governance Dr. Yılmaz Argüden1 “Price is what you pay. Value is...
International Journal of Disclosure & Governance
April 1, 2013
Is More Regulation the Right Recipe for Better Governance
Increasing regulation of corporate governance is becoming a new trend in many jurisdictions. Yet good governance...
October 2, 2012
Rio+20 was a Bust
World leaders from government, the business world, NGOs and academia gathered at the UN’s Rio+20 summit....
The Globalist
July 11, 2012
Why Boards Need More Women
Diversity on boards is critical to sustaining performance. Broadening the composition of the board increases the...
Harvard Business Review Blog
June 7, 2012
Global Boards Help Make Companies Global
For organizations to endure, they must strike a balance between risks and rewards, short-term objectives and...
Harvard Business Review Blog
November 9, 2011
Attitude is everything: The case for Turkiye
Recent local elections have been a wake up call for numerous European leaders such as Angela...
INSEAD Knowledge
April 28, 2011
Diversity at the Head Table
Click here to download as PDF.
October 25, 2010
Measuring the Effectiveness of Corporate Governance
Trust is the foundation of sustainable development. As the world continues to get smaller, our mutual...
INSEAD Knowledge
April 15, 2010
ARGE Corporate Governance Model©
Click here to download as PDF.
March 15, 2010
Consensual Delegation of Sovereignty
Thanks to changes in IMF voting, countries such as China, Mexico and Turkey now have a...
The Globalist
November 18, 2009
The Power of Inclusion
Editor’s note: When US President Barack Obama landed in Ankara on Monday, April 6, 2009, it...
Harvard Business Review Editors' Blog
April 9, 2009
From Global Crises to Global Governance
In a perspective from Turkiye, top business strategist and civic leader Yilmaz Argüden explores how global...
March 28, 2009
Opportunity from Crisis: Obama’s Chance for Real Global Leadership
In a perspective from Turkiye, top business strategist and civic leader Yilmaz Argüden argues that Barack...
The Globalist
February 20, 2009
Europe’s Dilemma: Values vs Interests and Protectionism vs Leadership
For decades European development has been guided by a number of key values: human rights, democracy,...
World Economic Forum
December 18, 2006
Legislating History
Recently various Parliaments throughout the world started to get in the business of legislating history!! Generally...
October 24, 2006
US – Turkish Cooperation Based on Shared Values
Since 9/11, the US unilateralism has been widely interpreted as a projection of hard power to...
September 5, 2005
Shaping The Future
The choices we make today shape not only the current results, but also the future. However,...
Dünya Gazetesi
March 2, 2005
Water and Global Governance
The 5th World Water Forum has convened in Istanbul. Water is life. Everywhere and every day we need it. Water...
Global Compact
March 1, 2005
The Missing Political Debate
The US presidential elections have profound implications not just for the US, but also for the...
April 6, 2004
Lead Indicators
Managers usually make their decisions based on metrics, which can easily be measured and has an...
January 21, 2004
Family Businesses
Happy families are all alike, but each unhappy family has reasons of its own. Leo Tolstoy...
July 10, 2000
European Union and Turkiye in 2020
“The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams.” Eleanor Roosevelt Let...
July 3, 2000
Civil Society in Support of University
“Only the educated are free” Epictetus That the importance of education increases further everyday is beyond...
June 17, 2000
Democratization of Capital
“You cannot escape the responsibility of tomorrow by escaping today.” Abraham Lincoln In today’s world only...
June 17, 2000
Second Career
“Life consists not in holding good cards but in playing those you hold well.” Joel Billings...
June 17, 2000
Center of Attraction
“It is not in the stars to hold our destiny, but in ourselves.” William Shakespeare To...
June 5, 2000
Going Beyond the Borders
“The shell must break before the bird can fly.” Lord Alfred Tennyson The greatest obstacle to...
May 30, 2000
Galatasaray and Education of a Nation
“Winning is not everything, but the will to win is everthing.” Vince Lombardi Education of a...
May 23, 2000
Corporate Governance
“The best way to create trust in an organization is to open all doors – from...
May 17, 2000
Those Who Fail to Share, Will Be Shared Out
“Dünyada görmek istediğin değişimi, önce kendinde gerçekleştirmelisin.” Mahatma Gandhi Unprecedent improvements in information and communication technologies,...
April 24, 2000
Representative Democracy to Participatory Democracy
“A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” Confucius Decisions that are not...
April 17, 2000
Reform in Patent Legislation
“Change starts when someone sees the next step.” William Drayton Developed countries are adamant about extending...
April 9, 2000
Leaders Magazine Interview
LEADERS Magazine Interview Questions for: Dr. Yılmaz Argüden Chairman ARGE Consulting, Istanbul Senior Advisor and Representative...
January 1, 2000
Managing Diversity
Ladies and Gentlemen, It is a great pleasure and honor for me to address you to...
January 1, 2000
World Leadership by Example: Challenge for EU
The potential of EU for the leadership of the world was the subject of the largest...
January 1, 2000
Education for Sustainable Global Governance
Vision: The world will be a more stable and innovative place to live for the human...
January 1, 2000
Global Fault Line
Humanity’s search for truth and curiosity to reach further locations have been an ever lasting ambition....
January 1, 2000
Turkish-American relations and TAİK
Turkish-U.S. Business Council (TAİK) Chairman Dr. Yılmaz Argüden answered our questions concerning Turkish-American relations and the...
January 1, 2000
Global NATO
The most important role of government is to provide security and maintain stability. Significant changes occurred...
January 1, 2000